Bo, I do not know of a SOL within the MOQ. Your argument have not convinced me otherwise. RMP is alive, hopefully well, and living in New England. If he would choose to present a convincing argument that the levels should be re-configured, and there should be such a SOL within the MOQ, then he is free to do that.
Marsha At 08:51 AM 2/13/2008, you wrote: >Hi Marsha. > >12 February you wrote: > >Chis to Bo: > > > >If anyone can point to some elaborate, abstract thoughts that did > > > >not serve the values of the social level or the biological and were > > > >clearly not a part of a S/O distinction(and was not the MOQ) - > > > >would that prove the SOL invalid? > >Marsha: > > Re: Above question? > >Bo: I responded before I saw your comments, but as you se I >interpreted Chris' question as pertaining to the many efforts to >undermine the SOL by pointing to non-S/O intellectual patterns >(an oxymoron) most prominently Pirsig's in "Lila's Child" about >formal logic, mathematics a, computer language. > > > Is it elaborate? > >To me the question was clear (elaborated) enough. > > > Does it serve the social or biological levels? > >What serves? The question, or? > > > Does it represent subject-object distinction? > >?? > > > Is it the MOQ? > >Too cryptic, you have to elaborate . > >Bo > > > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ ********* The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony without end. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
