Hi Ron
> Ron:
> Will Rogers was famous for the quote "I never met a man I didn't like"
> But I digress, what do say we clear this up a bit, maybe we are missing
> Each other.
Clearing up sounds good.
> You were stating that MoQ does not fall into the same
> Category as SOM in regard to static intellectual patterns.
> I disagreed.
> I interpreted you as saying that
> Rocks, computers and slips of paper do not fall into the
> Category as thoughts and concepts that they are objective facts.
Almost. But with the crucial difference that they are not quite
objective facts. All static patterns are involved in quality
events, and in a quality event there is always one subject and one
object. When a rock falls onto another rock, one is subject and the
other is subject. When an amoeba feels the scent of food, the amoeba
is likely to be categorized as the subject and the scent is the object.
But that's just the SOM way of seeing it, the MoQ says that the roles
can just as well be reversed.
Actually, I haven't thought much about why (and if) we need to keep
calling the parties in a quality event subject and object, since the
difference is unclear. They are simply equal parties in the event.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
