At 03:36 AM 2/12/2008, Magnus wrote: >Almost. But with the crucial difference that they are not quite >objective facts. All static patterns are involved in quality >events, and in a quality event there is always one subject and one >object. When a rock falls onto another rock, one is subject and the >other is subject. When an amoeba feels the scent of food, the amoeba >is likely to be categorized as the subject and the scent is the object. >But that's just the SOM way of seeing it, the MoQ says that the roles >can just as well be reversed. > >Actually, I haven't thought much about why (and if) we need to keep >calling the parties in a quality event subject and object, since the >difference is unclear. They are simply equal parties in the event.
Greetings, I think about it all the time. Would it be possible to frame discussions centered on the experiential events of patterns of value? Isn't that how you are seeing it? Marsha ********* The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony without end. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
