Greetings Marsha -- > I can't speak for the MOQ either, but individuals exist > as ever-changing collections of overlapping, interrelated, > inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns > of value. (Not subjects and objects.) And that seems no > less precious and profound. > > It seems important to add something to my sentence in my > last post so make that 'precious, profound and also ordinary,'
Your concept of the individual appears to be that of the MOQ. Now that you've confirmed that explanation, I'll follow your example and amend my previous comment as follows: > We cannot prove that subjectivity exists. Which is why, for the radical > empiricists and MOQ hierarchians, it must be explained away as a myth. Regards, Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
