At 01:09 PM 4/7/2008, you wrote: >Greetings Marsha -- > > > I can't speak for the MOQ either, but individuals exist > > as ever-changing collections of overlapping, interrelated, > > inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns > > of value. (Not subjects and objects.) And that seems no > > less precious and profound. > > > > It seems important to add something to my sentence in my > > last post so make that 'precious, profound and also ordinary,' > >Your concept of the individual appears to be that of the MOQ. >Now that you've confirmed that explanation, I'll follow your example and >amend my previous comment as follows: > > > We cannot prove that subjectivity exists. Which is why, for the radical > > empiricists and MOQ hierarchians, it must be explained away as a myth. > >Regards, >Ham
Greetings Ham, Myth? You who insist on a Primary Source and Purpose? Come on... Marsha Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
