Hi David -- > For me, subjectivity is what DQ looks like when you > mix it with 4 levels of SQ. So its a composite thing, > that's why it disappears or dis-emerges when you > run it over. Of course DQ can't be run over! So > we are not simply mortal, yet bodily mortal. > Possibilities cannot be made not to exist, only become and > begone, and eternally returned, ditto Nietzsche. > Such was the problem with Hamlet's dad.
I'm not sure what you mean by "we are not simply mortal, yet bodily mortal." Nietzsche was a nihilist who understood man's need for spirituality. Hamlet was an agnostic troubled by the dread of what may lie in the hereafter. A composite is a collection of diverse components. (Experiential existence is a composite system, for example.) A human being is not a "composite" but a dualistic entity: being-aware. The binary nature of existence is a manifestation of the division of sensibility and otherness which accounts for all differentiation. I am an individuated entity who derives his 'being' and sensibility from an absolute source. The copula in being-aware is Value, and beingness for me is my valuistic representation of the primary source. Epistemologically I am value-sensibility limited by nothingness. Thus, my experience "straddles the fence" between what is and what is not. But since value and sensibility are finite aspects of Essence divided by nothingness, and Essence negates nothingness, ultimate reality transcends all difference. This doesn't mean that I'm immortal; rather, it suggests that my experiential existence is only a finite sense my connection to something far more fundamental, namely the essential source. At least that's the way I see it, David. Regards, Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
