Hi Ham For me, subjectivity is what DQ looks like when you mix it with 4 levels of SQ. So its a composite thing, that's why it disappears or dis-emerges when you run it over. Of course DQ can't be run over! So we are not simply mortal, yet bodily mortal. Possibilities cannot be made not to exist, only become and begone, and eternally returned, ditto Nietzsche. Such was the problem with Hamlet's dad.
David M > Greetings Marsha -- > >> I can't speak for the MOQ either, but individuals exist >> as ever-changing collections of overlapping, interrelated, >> inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns >> of value. (Not subjects and objects.) And that seems no >> less precious and profound. >> >> It seems important to add something to my sentence in my >> last post so make that 'precious, profound and also ordinary,' > > Your concept of the individual appears to be that of the MOQ. > Now that you've confirmed that explanation, I'll follow your example and > amend my previous comment as follows: > >> We cannot prove that subjectivity exists. Which is why, for the radical >> empiricists and MOQ hierarchians, it must be explained away as a myth. > > Regards, > Ham > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
