> Ron:
> Lets start over SA, I find this is beginning to slip
> away.
> "The labeling of DQ is a taboo" is a fallacy, and I
> do
> Stand by that statement. I had said:
> "Dynamic Quality is meant to operate
> As an abstract descriptor."
SA: Ok. Are you saying that dq and sq are
descriptors of experience? When I think about it, it
seems s/o is a descriptor of mental abilities. It
still holds, though, that dq and sq are mental
descriptors, yet, of experience, whereas, s/o are not
descriptors of experience but simply descriptors of
what mind can do. Does this make sense? If I follow
your logic, it seems this is what I get, but I don't
know if this is what you mean.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
