> Ron:
> Lets start over SA, I find this is beginning to slip
> away.
> "The labeling of DQ is a taboo" is a fallacy, and I
> do
> Stand by that statement. I had said:
> "Dynamic Quality is meant to operate
> As an abstract descriptor."
SA: Ok. Are you saying that dq and sq are
descriptors of experience? When I think about it, it
seems s/o is a descriptor of mental abilities. It
still holds, though, that dq and sq are mental
descriptors, yet, of experience, whereas, s/o are not
descriptors of experience but simply descriptors of
what mind can do. Does this make sense? If I follow
your logic, it seems this is what I get, but I don't
know if this is what you mean.
Ron:
By leaving DQ/SQ free to interpret nouns where Subject/object had done
Previously, it opens up an entirely different conception of experience.
Nouns then have an expression of happening rather than static objects or
subjects.
Descriptors of experience are descriptors of mind. That is why I say
Grammar dictates intellectual thought.
If we, by Pirsigs suggestion, change the rules of grammar we change the
way we intellectualize.
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
