Ron:
> Please read these
> links for a better
> Understanding, they are not long but deliver the
> situation in
> Greater detail. Take you a couple of minutes to read
> both
> And would aid greatly in understanding where I'm
> coming
> From.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_white_horse_is_not_a_horse
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary/secondary_quality_distinction
SA: I'll get to these when I have a chance. I'm
getting focused on other activities in my free time
now, probably due to the warmer weather. Yesterday I
slept a lot, very busy at work, and watchin' the young
one while wife is working extra hours coaching
volleyball. After work, I'm cleaning, cooking dinner,
playing outside with the son, and trying to rest when
I can, etc... since we're both busy and I don't want
the house to get all messed up. I'll respond to these
below. I've read your summary of the 'white hourse is
not a horse' before in your comments to Bo, but I'm
sure some wording details might be missing from my
comments if I don't read these links you provided.
I'll try to get to them.
> SA previously: First off, have we decided what dq
and sq are
> to take that next step to interpret a noun?
> Ron:
> That's exactly what Pirsig is proposing with the
> DQ/SQ concept. This is THE step.
> Ron:
> Ahhh here the knot, SQ and DQ are nothing but inward
> Distinctions for experience even they do not exist
> outside,
> That is the fallacy of SOM. It's why we get confused
> too.
SA: Then what's outside?
Also, I wondering, what's the big deal about
the moq not being fully defined?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
