[Chris]
It is not as if I'm some sort of hippie-anti-psychiatry-guy from the 60's.
=)

[Krimel]
Then stop talking like one.

[Chris]
What exactly is it that you don't agree with? I mean, I don't think it's 
very strange or radical to point out (especially on this forum) that the 
basis that Psychiatry/Psychology  rests on is an unstable one.  The 
Mind/Matter paradox is ever present in the areas of Psychiatry/Psychology, 
and it continues to create huge problems.

[Krimel]
I am not sure which of the disagreements I have expressed is unclear to you
but among them, I disagree with the / between Psychiatry and Psychology.
Psychiatry is a medical specialty. Psychiatrists are medical doctors. They
can prescribe medicines and cut you open if they want. Clinical psychology
is an attempt to render scientific psychology into a technology. Clinical
psychologists do counseling and attempt to help people resolve inner
conflicts. Both disciplines are hampered by the fact that the subject of
their study is far more complicated and difficult to study than anything
found in physics or biology for example. 

Psychology as a science separated from philosophy in 1879 as Wundt, James
and others began to quit speculating about the mind body problem and to
actually look at what people do and how they think. Has this science
provided all of the answers? No, but it has produced some and it is a young
science. It is young because the tools needed to study it, both the
intellectual and the physical instruments, were only recently available.

But I would say that the mind/matter paradox has resolved into a consensus
that mind states are in fact brain states. There maybe pockets of resistance
to this but I think it is a stretch to say that the science of psychology is
onshaky ground because of some philosophical paradox.

[Chris]
I base my criticism on having read about the history of "madness" and 
Psychiatry, and about what problems have been facing the area, and what 
problems is facing it. The are almost all of the based on this paradox, and 
the problems is the same now as it was when Descartes made everyone pissed 
of by pointing to it - and long before then.

[Krimel]
The history of madness like the history of any intractable problem from
crime to poverty, is fraught with examples of injustice, ineptness and
cruelty. Cartesian duality is no more a culprit here than Jewish monotheists
blaming madness on demon possession. 

What I am saying is that you are over simplifying and that is not something
one should expect from a historian.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to