> squonk: > I take the view that a Carbon atom experiences DQ as a mystical experience > > which is in its >own way comparable to that?experienced by people: Lila > > explores how it is that we >experience DQ differently, DQ doesn't evolve > > (DQ simply is, one can't have more or less of >it) it is the static > > filters?which evolve, so they can experience DQ with different > (increasing) > >intensity. > A Carbon atom is a static structure which experiences DQ in its own way - > > it is its own >filter for DQ. > > As such, it may be possible to rank DQ events as experienced by static > > filters because it >could be argued that more evolved filters experience > DQ > more intensly. [Chris] I must say I wholeheartedly agree with this! And so it naturally follows that the theoretical übermench is one that is more evolved in the aspect of being able to see more pure Quality (DQ) and are not tied down by the static patterns as much. Regards
Hi Chris, Thank you for letting me know this is also the way you think about this matter. Much appreciated. squonk Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
