Ian,
I don't want to speak for dmb, but how I read dmb's post was in the fashion
of 'where will this thought-experiment lead us?'. I discussed at length with
Squonk about the real time participance. If Squonk wants babies to be breed,
industrailized, and technologically sustained without human parents, then it
would seem Squonk is willing to go far with this. If sensory experience is to
be not good for dq experience, then dmb's comment was thoughtful. If dq
experience is the moral high ground we all agree upon, but the way to this dq
experience is to rid sensory experience and find static patterns as a waste of
time to be only something of a hurdle, well, isn't Squonk basically saying
pluck out the eye-balls and rid the nose so we can have a better experience of
dq? I didn't find it to be a degenerative rhetorical comment by dmb, but a
comment of conclusion if we follow this line of thinking that Squonk either is
not providing enough for us to
understand or we understand very well.
I also brought your name up to see if you wanted to provide something
thoughtful about, apparently, something you came up in the first place and
maybe we're all twisting it up in ways that you didn't intend.
SA
SA previously:
> ok, thanks
>
> SA
>
>
> --- On Sun, 6/29/08, Ian Glendinning
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Ian Glendinning
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [MD] moq thought experiement 1.
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 3:46 AM
> > Hi SA, I did yes.
> > The rhetoric I noticed when I said "I see what
> the
> > problem is" was in the
> > "plucking out babies eyes, etc" response
> from DMB
> > - all good fun. Whatever
> > Mark's thought experiment - I doubt such an idea
> > entered into it ?
> > (But I could be corrected, again.)
> > Ian
> >
> > On 6/29/08, Heather Perella
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ian:
> > > Thanks SA, I was just responding to that one
> reference
> > addressed to me.
> > > We need to be careful which parts remain a
> thought
> > experiment ;-) how we
> > > might put any parts into practice.
> > > Finding a child (with brain intact) in a feral /
> > natural state is one thing
> > > - or considering "if" one existed -
> however
> > creating one to experiment on
> > > would be another. The rhetoric blurred that.
> > >
> > >
> > > SA: Ian, sorry I'm asking, but did you see
> the
> > post in which I responded
> > > to you about how Squonk introduced the babies.
> No
> > rhetoric. Didn't see any
> > > rhetoric. If there was, could you point it out
> to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > SA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > >
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> > >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
