Hi SA, I?agree with you in this. That's the way i've always seen it, but i am prepared to rethink the matter if provided with a good argument. squonk
Squonk, Chris, and others, ???? I find what you said here Squonk comes close, if not the same or part of what I'm trying to communicate when I say: ???? a rock is an analogy of dq woods, SA > > squonk: > > I take the view that a Carbon atom experiences DQ as a > mystical experience > > which is in its >own way comparable to > that?experienced by people: Lila > > explores how it is that we >experience DQ > differently, DQ doesn't evolve > > (DQ simply is, one can't have more or less of > >it) it is the static > > filters?which evolve, so they can experience DQ with > different > > (increasing) >intensity. > > A Carbon atom is a static structure which experiences > DQ in its own way - > > it is its own >filter for DQ. > > As such, it may be possible to rank DQ events as > experienced by static > > filters because it >could be argued that more > evolved filters experience > > DQ more intensly. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
