Hi SA, I did yes. The rhetoric I noticed when I said "I see what the problem is" was in the "plucking out babies eyes, etc" response from DMB - all good fun. Whatever Mark's thought experiment - I doubt such an idea entered into it ? (But I could be corrected, again.) Ian
On 6/29/08, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ian: > Thanks SA, I was just responding to that one reference addressed to me. > We need to be careful which parts remain a thought experiment ;-) how we > might put any parts into practice. > Finding a child (with brain intact) in a feral / natural state is one thing > - or considering "if" one existed - however creating one to experiment on > would be another. The rhetoric blurred that. > > > SA: Ian, sorry I'm asking, but did you see the post in which I responded > to you about how Squonk introduced the babies. No rhetoric. Didn't see any > rhetoric. If there was, could you point it out to me. > > > SA > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
