squonk:
I take the view that a Carbon atom experiences DQ as a mystical experience
which is in its >own way comparable to that?experienced by people: Lila
explores how it is that we >experience DQ differently, DQ doesn't evolve
(DQ simply is, one can't have more or less of >it) it is the static
filters?which evolve, so they can experience DQ with different
(increasing) >intensity.
A Carbon atom is a static structure which experiences DQ in its own way -
it is its own >filter for DQ.
As such, it may be possible to rank DQ events as experienced by static
filters because it >could be argued that more evolved filters experience
DQ more intensly.
[Chris]
I must say I wholeheartedly agree with this! And so it naturally follows
that the theoretical übermench is one that is more evolved in the aspect of
being able to see more pure Quality (DQ) and are not tied down by the static
patterns as much.
Regards
Chris
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
