ok, thanks SA
--- On Sun, 6/29/08, Ian Glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Ian Glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [MD] moq thought experiement 1. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 3:46 AM > Hi SA, I did yes. > The rhetoric I noticed when I said "I see what the > problem is" was in the > "plucking out babies eyes, etc" response from DMB > - all good fun. Whatever > Mark's thought experiment - I doubt such an idea > entered into it ? > (But I could be corrected, again.) > Ian > > On 6/29/08, Heather Perella > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ian: > > Thanks SA, I was just responding to that one reference > addressed to me. > > We need to be careful which parts remain a thought > experiment ;-) how we > > might put any parts into practice. > > Finding a child (with brain intact) in a feral / > natural state is one thing > > - or considering "if" one existed - however > creating one to experiment on > > would be another. The rhetoric blurred that. > > > > > > SA: Ian, sorry I'm asking, but did you see the > post in which I responded > > to you about how Squonk introduced the babies. No > rhetoric. Didn't see any > > rhetoric. If there was, could you point it out to me. > > > > > > SA > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
