hi, so platt thinks nature = biological quality. i disagree. nature is the tao. it is Dq. i think this is self-evident when it comes to taoism. any others agree/disagree?
--- On Thu, 10/7/08, Platt Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Platt Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [MD] Static Self > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: Thursday, 10 July, 2008, 12:52 AM > > [Platt to Gav] > > Your "new mode of existence" sounds > suspiciously like the Hippie commune mode > > of the 60's. No need to repeat Pirsig's > explanation of why it failed. > > > > [Arlo] > > What part of what Gav said was "mistaking > biological for Dynamic Quality"? > > That's why Pirsig said the hippie movement, a > MORAL movement, failed > > ultimately. But apart from that confusion (biological > with Dynamic) it was the > > moral direction we should have gone. Now... what part > of what Gav said repeats > > that mistake? > > [Platt] > I assume you've read Gav's paean to Pantheism, the > philosophy rooted in the > glories of the biological level. Seems that's where Gav > finds DQ in > abundance. If I'm wrong, I look forward to Gav > correcting me. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Start at the new Yahoo!7 for a better online experience. www.yahoo7.com.au Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
