Hi Ham, Well said. By daring to state the truth you can expect the usual slimes from the collectivists because they can't form a cogent argument to refute your points. Thus, the hysterics and name-calling.
Regards, Platt On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Ham Priday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arlo -- > > So is no one gonna cowboy-up and tell me why I should feel >> that "our population is becoming Hispanic"? Is no one, not even >> Ham who made this fear-threat, gonna answer me as to how my >> individual liberty and lorious proprietary self is threatened by this? >> > > It never ceases to amaze me how you can take comments out of context and > twist them around to ludicrous conclusions with apparent immunity. Frankly, > I didn't think your hysterics about my stand on multiculturalism merited a > response. I made this statement to Platt who on 7/20 claimed that my views > on social morality fit what "is known officially in academic circles as > 'multiculturalism'." > > I said nothing about hatred for Blacks or Hispanics, nor did I raise a > "fear threat" about mixed populations or call immigrants "enemies" or > "terrorists". What I said was . . . > > When a society accommodates itself to the moral values of a foreign >> culture, >> such as Western Europe trying to assimilate a growing Islamic population, >> it doesn't become "amoral"; it simply beomes more liberal. That is, its >> morality >> is expanded to embrace two moral systems. This weakens the sovereign >> culture of the adopter nation, creating law enforcement problems and >> social >> unrest, which is why--and I'm surprised you don't know this--I am opposed >> to >> multiculturalism. >> > > That our population is rapidly becoming Hispanic is a matter of fact, not > hypocrisy or > homophobic thinking. According to the U.S. Census, the nation's Hispanic > population has reached 15.1 percent of the estimated total U.S. population > of 301.6 million. Hispanics remain the largest and fastest-growing minority > group. > > This poses problems for the values that are indigenous to American culture. > It affects our language, for one thing. Already we see traffic signs, > telephone books, and instruction manuals printed in two languages. And, > because we've been negligent in defending our borders, illegal immigrants > are demanding -- and getting -- citizen benefits they have no right to > expect. In California a serial murderer is sueing the government for a > prison sentence, although his illegal status doesn't even grant him the > right to a U.S.trial. Why do we bend the law to favor non-citizens? Because > Multiculturalism is touted as the "new morality" of America. > > Yes, I do believe this ideology is damaging our historical heritage, And, > because I am a moral relativist who believes that every culture determines > its own moral standards, I don't want to see my children and future > generations of our proud nation having to speak a foreign language, > attending daily prayer rituals, wearing veils, or spending their hard-won > earnings to support those who demand that WE change our laws, yet haven't > respected our sovereignty enough to come here legally. > > It may not be "the end of liberty and the enslavement of mankind", but is > will surely "lead to > the destruction of America" as we know it. > > Okay, now you can return to your diatribe. > > --Ham > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
