[Platt] Yes, views different from Arlo's are automatically classified as "anti-intellectual." And his idea of "substance" is only what he says. Anyone for an outsized ego?
[Arlo] More evasion, still no substance. I'll keep waiting... Or kindly point to me where the "substance" is that I missed to support the notion that "the destruction of America" will result from "our population becoming Hispanic"? Kindly point to me anything you've said of substance that is not simply the same ad nauseum "evil collectivist multiculturalists in the academy destroying America". Because if you think simply parroting such empty slogans is "substantive", it may explain why you hate the academy with such passion. Because, gee, if that's "substantive" and "intellectual", then I guess my saying that "all neoconservatives are closet homosexual fascists and masquerade their sexual inadequacies as mindless support of the only place they feel empowered, robbing poor people and satiating their pathetic egos with the mistaken belief that THEIR skin color and THEIR culture make the superior to the rest of the worlds colored inferior people". Yep, let's see how you respond to that "intellectual" and "substantive" "view" that is different from your own. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
