embrace evolution.

homo superior is the problem - humans as superior than other life. this is 
damaging nonsense. we are inseparable from all phenomena - from the earth - at 
the fundamental level. tat tvam asi.
for something to be superior requires a reciprocal inferiority on the part of 
the other. this sounds like a (psychopathological) complex to me.

homo holos is more to my liking.


--- On Wed, 30/7/08, Peter Corteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Peter Corteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Tit's
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: Wednesday, 30 July, 2008, 7:06 PM
> sorry dave, gav; not trying to put words into anyone's
> mouths but I did say
> you can't reject SOM. Likewise we are stuck with
> language and it's adopted
> child, aleph beth; embrace them as the ancestors of the
> homo superior.
> 
> 2008/7/30 gav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > sorry to butt in but some nlp techniques seem to have
> pooped in here (just
> > used one myself - did ya see it?).
> > dave didn't say that we can't reject SOM -
> only you did peter.
> > its SOM or MOQ (or some other similar monistic
> paradigm) - cannae have it
> > both ways.
> >
> > jeez that is the whole point - replacing SOM with
> MOQ...that's why we're
> > here, that's why bob wrote and thought a lot and
> went a bit potty....its a
> > big deal guys and gals....we are talking about a new
> reality, literally.
> >
> > we are suspended in a language that is divorced from
> the world around us.
> > it is a legacy of the importation of the hebrew
> alphabet into greece....what
> > resulted was a language composed of characters that
> had no connection to the
> > world from which they were originally drawn.
> > separation....plato's forms....christian
> heaven....descartes, copernicus,
> > galilieo:SOM....
> > the damage this has done to the psyche, to the
> earth...is
> > awe-inspiring...really amazing.
> >  such a little thing....hey boromir.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 30/7/08, Peter Corteen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peter Corteen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: [MD] Tit's
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Received: Wednesday, 30 July, 2008, 5:50 PM
> > > Hi dmb,
> > >
> > > agreed that we can't reject SOM and that the
> > > 'experience of not being able
> > > to walk through is more real than the
> > > "wall"'. SOM is an indispensable
> > > convention that we are hard wired with. You
> can't have
> > > mind without matter
> > > and vice-versa; I acknowledge spirit only in
> terms of
> > > intentionality. What
> > > will be the characteristics of those beings who
> are not
> > > limited by SOM?
> > >
> > > -Peter
> > >
> > > 2008/7/29 david buchanan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Peter said:
> > > > SOM - mind and matter, it's more than a
> thinking
> > > convention; we have no
> > > > choice but to act as if it's so - just
> try
> > > pretending the wall isn't there
> > > > and try to walk through it, you can't.
> > > >
> > > > dmb says:
> > > > The fact that we can't walk through
> walls remains
> > > even if we reject SOM.
> > > > Likewise, adopting the MOQ does not entail
> any claims
> > > about being able to
> > > > walk through walls. Think of it in terms of
> reversing
> > > the relationship
> > > > between "objects" and
> "quality".
> > > SOM says the wall is an objective reality,
> > > > a real substance, and its properties or
> qualities are
> > > such that it can not
> > > > be walked through. It has hardness and
> flatness. It
> > > offers resistance when
> > > > we put pressure on it. The MOQ says that
> these
> > > qualities come first and that
> > > > the "wall" is secondary, an
> interpretation
> > > of the qualities felt in
> > > > experience. And of course the idea of a
> > > "wall" works well with many other
> > > > ideas such as doors and windows. (The idea
> of a wall
> > > also connects to paint,
> > > > to floors, ceilings, houses, gardens, towns,
> Berlin
> > > during the Cold War,
> > > > China during the Mongol invasions and, the
> line
> > > between church and state, a
> > > > place of blindfolded executions, to a lesser
> or
> > > greater degree, to every
> > > > other idea in the whole lang
> > > >  uage system.) In the MOQ, the experience of
> not being
> > > able to walk through
> > > > is more real than the "wall". As
> in the hot
> > > stove example, the "wall" is
> > > > subsequently ascribed as the reason or cause
> of not
> > > being able to walk
> > > > through. Rejecting SOM in no way denies the
> experience
> > > from which these
> > > > ideas are derived, it is simply a matter of
> stepping
> > > back to see that
> > > > subjects and objects are conventional
> concepts, useful
> > > concepts, rather than
> > > > the starting point of reality or the cause
> of
> > > experience. The MOQ says that
> > > > experience comes first, that experience IS
> reality. In
> > > that sense, not being
> > > > able to walk through is as real as it gets.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Use video conversation to talk face-to-face
> with
> > > Windows Live Messenger.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_video_072008
> > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > > Archives:
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > >
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> > > >
> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> >
> >       Find a better answer, faster with the new
> Yahoo!7 Search.
> > www.yahoo7.com.au/search
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> >
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


      Find a better answer, faster with the new Yahoo!7 Search. 
www.yahoo7.com.au/search
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to