Marsha:
So my idea is that patterns are conceptual (mental activity), and, in
the case of inorganic, NOT the external natural phenomenon. The
patterns refers to the external natural phenomenon, but IS NOT the
external natural phenomenon.
woods:
Swooping through.
I find the patterns are external, but are not separate, they are connected,
but
they are also internal. I'm not going to use internal or external any further
or
else lines of delineation may confuse what I'm saying.
Patterns are mental, but I also find patterns to be value. The patterns
in a tree are influenced by the sun and the source of water, these are
main influencers. Thus, the roots and thereby the tree may pattern its' trunk
and
roots towards the water more. Same if a clearer source of sunlight is in a
nearby
clearing. This is not a mental pattern. This is an organic pattern. The
tree is valuing sun and water and grows accordingly, values accordingly. With
patterns structured that biology class would then intellectually teach somebody
about in more detail or art class would then intellectually teach somebody
about
in more detail or somebody being artistic would intellectually connect with
on their own without the teacher. This isn't about the teacher or who is
taught or not.
Marsha, are you saying all is mental and then all these patterns emerge out
of this
mental substratum into organic, society, etc... until a particularly patterned
creature
comes along and can pick up on and perceive and internally noticed this mental
substratum that is everywhere?
woods
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
