[Marsha] > I might find a better way to > demonstrate the idea that patterns are conceptual.
Why not say all patterns are conceptualizable. This establishs a necessary relationship between patterns & concepts, without making them identical. Craig >From an advertisement in "Scientific American" (Nov. 2008): "'The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, And the Unification of Forces' by Frank Wilczek Frank Wilczek, winner of the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics, unwraps exciting new ideas, among them...that space is DYNAMIC...it opens new possibilities for making connections among PATTERNS that previously seemed unrelated. If our fundamental equations describe partial patterns that we can make more symmetric,...we're tempted to think that maybe they really are just facets of the larger, unified structure." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
