At 02:49 PM 11/6/2008, you wrote:
I still find patterns to not be about subjects
conceptualizing, but also objects and their patterns, too.
Thus, not subjects nor objects, but value. Not this
mental understanding, but an understanding of value is
where I'm coming from, but mentally trying to understand
is another way if you so desire.
woods
Greetings Woods,
There are no subjects and no objects. There is only value, and I'm
interested in investigating the patterned value. So, yes.
I cannot help the way I am constructed. I am mentally curious. I
like to think about things. I also know, as Ron said, reality is
beyond definition. But I can't help it. Should I be doing something else?
Painting is another way to understand value. Meditation is
another. Maybe I should learn to make and bake bread? Are you hungry?
Marsha
________________________________
From: MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2008 2:07:40 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] patterns revisited
At 01:54 PM 11/6/2008, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
> > I might find a better way to
> > demonstrate the idea that patterns are conceptual.
>
>Why not say all patterns are conceptualizable.
>This establishs a necessary relationship between
>patterns & concepts, without making them identical.
>Craig
>
> >From an advertisement in "Scientific American" (Nov. 2008):
>"'The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, And the Unification
>of Forces' by Frank Wilczek
>Frank Wilczek, winner of the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics,
>unwraps exciting new ideas, among them...that space is
>DYNAMIC...it opens new possibilities for making
>connections among PATTERNS that previously seemed unrelated.
>If our fundamental equations describe partial patterns that we
>can make more symmetric,...we're tempted to think that
>maybe they really are just facets of the larger, unified
>structure."
Greetings,
I cannot accept that patterns are just conceptualizable. Take away
conceptions and there is sight, hearing, smell, taste, or
touch. None of it making any "sense". You see only shapes of
color. Even depth is conceptualized. Depth is the patterned
relationship between patterns. New possibilities of connected
patterns should be obvious because experience is the intersection of
relationship.
Marsha
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
..
..
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
..
..
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
