Ron:
> in effect, in your interpretation the order would be:
> 1: MoQ (reality)
> 2: SOM (intellect)
> 3: social
> 4: organic
> 5: inorganic
Bo:
Yes, it will look like this ... only I would put intellect (the level) in its
proper place and put SOM in parenthesis. The MOQ is the DQ/SQ
reality that replaces the former Subject/Object reality, so you see each
level can be regarded as reality (or metaphysics) that has replaced the
former.
woods:
Long, long ago, in one of my first posts about Bo's SOL position I asked
Bo if he knew Comte who made levels of history. As a new historical
period came about he made a new level. Thus, history was linear
and had a projectory along this linear line. No interwining. Bo of course
ignored it, but this clearly shows he follows in the tradition of Comte. It's
not a negative thing, just a way to understand what Bo's saying.
Ron:
Woods, Bo,
Good point Woods, Bo clearly defines his reasoning in this statement
as the levels representing an evolutionary timeline.
I immediately notice in this construction the one main MoQ notion
of Quality being undefined not being addressed with the assertion
of MoQ as reality. In Bo's interpretation, DQ/SQ IS the true manifestation
of ultimate reality.
Bo, in this interpretation, how does DQ/SQ (reality) function?
Does DQ represent motion and change and SQ consistencey
rigity and lack of motion? an Energy/matter type of configuration?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
