>[Ham] >Despite the confusion, it's apparent that at least three of us understand >that the "patterning" of Value is conceptual, which is to say that objective > >phenomena are the intellectual constructs of value perception. > > > [Marsha] > > I cannot think of SPoVs as anything but conceptual. > > SPoVs are known (conceptual [value]), phenomenon is > > direct experience (value) until a recognized pattern. > > > [Ron] > > Thats the way I see it too Marsha. SPoV are conceptual > > understandings about dynamic quality. > >[Krimel] >So for the three of you life, the universe and everything can be reduced to >mental events? Isn't that just a form of radical subjectism; even solipsism?
Marsha No, not at all. Phenomenon is experienced but then parsed into known, conceptual patterns. That is not solipsism. [Krimel] What is experienced? What "parses"? What is "knowing"? What is a "concept"? . . The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end. . . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
