At 10:47 AM 11/13/2008, you wrote:
>[Ham]
>Despite the confusion, it's apparent that at least three of us understand
>that the "patterning" of Value is conceptual, which is to say that
objective
>
>phenomena are the intellectual constructs of value perception.
>
> > [Marsha]
> > I cannot think of SPoVs as anything but conceptual.
> > SPoVs are known (conceptual [value]), phenomenon is
> > direct experience (value) until a recognized pattern.
>
> > [Ron]
> > Thats the way I see it too Marsha. SPoV are conceptual
> > understandings about dynamic quality.
>
>[Krimel]
>So for the three of you life, the universe and everything can be reduced to
>mental events? Isn't that just a form of radical subjectism; even
solipsism?
Marsha
No, not at all. Phenomenon is experienced but then parsed into
known, conceptual patterns. That is not solipsism.
[Krimel]
What is experienced? What "parses"? What is "knowing"? What is a "concept"?
Krimel,
Parse, knowing, concept are analogies and static patterns of value.
Even 'experience' is an analogy.
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
