Greetings,
What experience or patterning determines when to suspend disbelief?
Marsha
At 06:37 AM 11/17/2008, you wrote:
Marsha,
science requires that we dont acquiesce but instead question all the time.
Sorry but your question is not straightforward, what do you mean by the word
'inhabit'?
-KO
2008/11/17 MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> KO,
>
> My question was about Quantum Physics, and the Sacred Church of Science and
> its Inquisitors. That is the Inquisitor points to S-C-I-E-N-C-E and one is
> suppose to drop any challenge and acquiesce to Science's sacred status and
> "turths". My question has evolved to ask if electrons, protons, neutrons,
> and their sub particles are spov that have as their referent external,
> natural phenomenon? I might also point to your post at 07:19 AM
> 11/16/2008, where you and Andre warned of the danger of unchecked
social and
> intellectual levels.
>
> My original question was quite straight forward, "Don't electrons, protons,
> neutrons, and their sub particles inhabit a virtual world?" I'll ask it
> differently. Don't electrons, protons, neutrons, and their sub particles
> inhabit a mythic world?
>
> Marsha
>
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
