> An intellectualization (of the MoQ) is an intellectualization. The MoQ > is the MoQ. Quality is Quality. DQ is DQ. Fingers (or words or > intellects) pointing at any one them are fingers (or words or > intellects).
When are YOU gonna get uncomfortable with this silly finger/moon thing? The image of the heavenly body is just a subjective mindish secondary by-product - if you stick to intellect's S/O distinction and the MOQ is an alternative to SOM's platypus-spawnings. The MOQ revealed that the said platypis were caused by the S/O mistakenly being regarded as fundamental, while it as its own 4th.level it's a great static asset. > When are you guys ever gonna get comfortable with the recursion and > just let the emergence happen ? Trying to better define the MoQ (in > intellect) used to be called re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic > (sorry, no, e-arranging angels on the head of a pin) Looks as if real thinkers never will be comfortable with "just forget that platypus and be happy" attitude. Bo. Ron: When will the "real thinkers" support their opinions? it has yet to occur. Heres a bone for ya, I highly suggest you read it and compare it to your SOL interpetation. please tell me if It's close. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism thanks Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
