Hi Andre:
To extent you are right that DQ cannot be represented intellectually.
The intellectual pattern "DQ" is a finger pointing to the moon. Does
the term "ground of being" help? Like "Tao," "God,"
"Brahman,""undifferentiated aesthetic continuum," these are all fingers
pointing to the moon.
Best,
Steve
On Nov 18, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Steve:
The MOQ is an intellectual description of reality of which the MOQ is
a part. If the MOQ is not an intellectual pattern, then what do you
suppose it is? Pirsig claims that everyting fits into a four volume
encylcopedia plus DQ.
Andre:
Hi Steve, as I suggested to Ron in another post I am sitting in a
slump, a
mental block at the moment and find it difficult to get out of.
I understand that the MoQ is an intellectual formulation, a paradigm,
an
abstract formulation. What I have difficulty with is the DQ 'part'
which I
equate with the 'aesthetic continuum' which cannot be represented
intellectually, not even in an abstract way.
Maybe this is where my problem is.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
