Hi Krimel,

On Jul 5, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Krimel wrote:

Steve:
I wasn't trying to bring in any new controversy. I was just defending
DMB's claim that DQ/sq amounts to reality/concept where reality
simply refers to the conceptually unknown.

[Krimel]
Just to jump in and clarify something here. To the extent that "reality" is infinitely divisible, constantly changing, and unpredictable I agree that that is what DQ means. To the extent that concepts are static descriptions of this dynamic flux, order emerging from chaos, I agree that that is what SQ means. But that is not how Dave sees it. He thinks of DQ as a sense of Value, as the perception of "betterness." His is a purely subjective stance.

Steve:
I don't think DMB would say DQ is the *perception* of betternesss or *sense of* value. It is just betterness. As I understand Pirsig, what he is saying is that the "infinitely divisible, constantly changing, and unpredictable" stimulus that we know as reality is also the continuing immediate flux of "betterness" and "worseness" known as Quality. At least he wants us to to suppose for the sake of argument that that is what reality is and see where that postulate takes us. Now some people like Ham and maybe you object and say that that is simply not what anyone means by value or quality. Value is merely subjective. So MOQers are making all of reality subjective. Quality simply isn't the sort of thing that we should ever talk about as the "infinitely divisible, constantly changing, and unpredictable" conceptually unknown reality. But Pirsig is talking about it that way anyway, and many of us have found the Quality metaphor to be extremely fruitful. We seem to agree that Pirsig uses the words value and quality in ways that we never thought of using them before and is thereby expanding or changing the definitions of the terms to even include the undefinable. Where we may disagree is about whether that is worth doing.

Best,
Steve


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to