[Platt]
"Conservatism" doesn't appear in the quotes at all.

[Arlo reposts]
Who was that "lesser storm" contrasting? "Liberals" and "conservatives". An
upheaval "not so great" as the one between socialism and fascism, but a
difference only of degree, according to Pirsig. [AND]  I mean, both fascism and
conservatism are programs for the dominance of society over intellect. Both
were (are) aggressively anti-intellectual. Both were (are) aggressively
nationalistic.

"Communism and socialism, programs for intellectual control over society, were
confronted by the reactionary forces of fascism, a program for the social
control of intellect." (Pirsig)

"Phaedrus thought that no other historical or political analysis explains the
enormity of these forces as clearly as does the Metaphysics of Quality. The
gigantic power of socialism and fascism, which have overwhelmed this century,
is explained by a conflict of levels of evolution." (Pirsig)

"In the United States the economic and social upheaval was not so great as in
Europe, but Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal, nevertheless, became the
center of a lesser storm between social and intellectual forces." (Pirsig)

[Arlo]
Arlo asks again. So WHO was this LESSER STORM between. What were the forces
between "intellectual control of society" and "social domination of intellect"
that were analogous to the socialism-fascism conflict going on in Europe?
Answer that. Go ahead.

The conflict in the US was "liberalism" versus "conservatism". Liberalism, like
socialism, championed the intellectual domination of society. Conservatism,
like fascism, champions the social domination of intellect. Its kinda obvious
to everyone else.

Its why the same anti-intellectual forces that go rabid about "radical
professors" today went after Pirsig back when he was teaching in Montana...
using the SAME TERM... "radical professor".

Its why BOTH conservatism and fascism are aggressively anti-intellectual and
aggressively nationalistic. Its why BOTH rage endlessly against the academy and
the "media". I mean, who do you think the Nazi's biggest "bugbears" were? Why
the "liberal media" and "radical liberal professors". Go figure that these are
the same major bugbears for conservatives today.

Nonetheless, as Pirsig pointed out, the modern trend in America is a slow-drift
back to Victorianism, to social domination of intellect. Now, WHO do you think
is behind that? Liberals? Socialists? Commies? That makes no sense, since all
three of these are "programs for the intellectual domination of society". Who
does that leave leading America retrogressively towards social domination of
intellect? Why conservatives, of course.  I mean, why do you think conservatism
has bedded the radical fundamentalist movement in this country? Because this
"base" wants nothing BUT the domination of social patterns over intellect.
Common goals. 

Again I ask. Where does Pirsig state, even ONCE, that the moral superiority of
intellect over society is in any way dependent on correcting its "defect"?
Where does he say ONCE that until such time as this defect is corrected that
the moral solution is to keep society in dominance of intellect?

As to the original point I commented on, which you've grossly obfuscated,
Pirsig himself is an intellectual who rationalized the value of intellect, a
charge you moronically tried to condemn DMB with. Like Pirsig, DMB has the
vision to see that the solution via the MOQ is to begin with non-S/O
intellectuals, like Pirsig and the early hippies and beats, and other non-S/O
thinkers to do this day (hell, including Dusenberry), who don't merely pursue
an anti-intellectual agenda, but pursue an expansion of intellect, a new
spiritual rationality, to correct S/O intellect's flaw. The aim is not to
subjugate intellect to society, but to expand its vision. This is what the MOQ
is, where the hippies were going, and where our vision should be directed. 




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to