Ron,
I completely agree. I admit to a bias against big government programs 
full of social planning for big masses of people. 

Platt 



On 3 Dec 2009 at 6:47, X Acto wrote:

> Platt,
> A excellent statement, this is the origin of my stance on
> the global warming controversy..
> Science is bias and always has been but, it has the provision
> for change.
> My arguement was and is, erring on the side of caution seems
> a wiser move than not. That generality is going to be filled with both
> good and bad, you highlight the bad. I think it has merit and looking
> at all the factors and weighing them is wiser than simply siding
> with a particular point of view.
> The question is does the bad side of environmentalism out weigh the good
> side of environmentalism? I do'nt have the all the info so I can't make
> a definate accurate judgement, but I agree, it's one this country needs to 
> address and figure out before we start throwing billions of dollar at it.
> I agree with that gripe.
> 
> -Ron
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, December 3, 2009 8:36:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
> 
> All:
> 
> If ever there was a tipoff to the fraud of global warming now being 
> exposed it was the claim by many of its proponents at the UN and 
> elsewhere that the science is settled. There is no such thing as settled 
> scientific theory. The MOQ states it perfectly:
> 
> "But scientific truth has always contained an overwhelming difference 
> from theological truth: it is provisional. Science always contains an 
> eraser, a mechanism whereby new Dynamic insight could wipe out old 
> static patterns without destroying science itself. Thus science, unlike 
> orthodox theology, has been capable of continuous, evolutionary 
> growth." (Lila, 17)
> 
> Science may be SOM with all of SOM's faults. But its built in ability to 
> respond to DQ, like capitalism, is its saving grace and reason for its 
> evolutionary success. 
> 
> Regards,
> Platt 
> 
>       
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to