Bye for now...



On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:35 PM, X Acto wrote:

> The law of non contradictions arguement is one of syllogistic meaning,
> Clarity in statements. 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sat, January 2, 2010 4:00:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Protagoras and "Measure"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ron,
> 
> Well, there is Aristotle's argument against Protagoras.    
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 2, 2010, at 3:35 PM, X Acto wrote:
> 
>> Marsha,
>> Aristotle makes an interesting arguement
>> for certainty in meaning. meaning. not "reality".
>> He seems to side with you that reality is relative.
>> -Ron
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Sat, January 2, 2010 11:35:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [MD] Protagoras and "Measure"
>> 
>> Ron,
>> 
>> I confess, I've never bothered much with Aristotle, and I'm more than a 
>> little concerned with your, or Aristotle's, use of the word 'certainty'.  To 
>> me 'certainty' translates into wishful thinking.  You know I'm partial to 
>> 'relative'.
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 2, 2010, at 11:24 AM, X Acto wrote:
>> 
>>> Marsha,
>>> Nope, just a tool for building certainty
>>> in meaning in the context of scientific
>>> inquirey.
>>> Aknowledging experience is relative
>>> in flux and ever dynamic.
>>> He takes time explaining why
>>> the greatest philosphers of the day
>>> fall short in their explainations.He
>>> emphasiszes that the careful construction
>>> of meaning is the only "knowledge"
>>> that may be derrived from experience.
>>> 
>>> I'm still reading but thats what I get so far.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Sat, January 2, 2010 10:36:23 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [MD] Protagoras and "Measure"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Happy new year Ron,
>>> 
>>> So, the Law of Non-Contradiction and the Law of Excluded 
>>> Middle are just tools and were never intended to be used to 
>>> determine Reality?  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 2, 2010, at 9:43 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Marsha,
>>>>> From what I understand of my reading of Aristotles metaphysics
>>>> it sure does. Aristotle starts from the premise of the dynamic
>>>> and the relative making the arguement for distinctions or measure
>>>> for better understanding. True/false, non contradiction, are tools
>>>> to create order from the flux. Conventions. Useful in the building
>>>> of certain types of knowledge, scientific. The metaphysics is a theory
>>>> on the building of scientific meaning.
>>>> 
>>>> To look back through a scientific dominated society at it as
>>>> a statement about the laws of "reality"  is taking it a bit out 
>>>> of context in my own opinion.
>>>> 
>>>> best wishes for a happy new year
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Sat, January 2, 2010 8:09:41 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [MD] Protagoras and "Measure"
>>>> 
>>>> Ian, Matt,
>>>> 
>>>> I have been haunted by something I read a while ago:  All knowledge is to 
>>>> some degree 
>>>> false because it is to some degree incomplete.  Wouldn't this make 
>>>> knowledge both
>>>> true and false?  And this morning I read that Feyerbend called the laws of 
>>>> formal logic naive.  
>>>> Margolis says much about adding Indeterminate to the bipolar truth-values: 
>>>> True or False, but
>>>> I'm finding his book very difficult because he mentions dozens of 
>>>> philosophers (briefly stating 
>>>> their argument) I have never heard of, and who seem to have some 
>>>> professional stake in 
>>>> this game.  But I wonder that DQ is present in every event and it is 
>>>> indeterminate.  Hmmm.  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 2, 2010, at 4:44 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Nice one Matt,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd seen tha ambiguity on the measure / rationality aspect before but
>>>>> not the things / experience side of it. Very interesting.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ian
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Matt Kundert
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I ran across something interesting today.  I didn't realize this, but 
>>>>>> Protagoras' famous aphorism "Man is the measure of all things..." has an 
>>>>>> ambiguity in the English (at least for amateurs who only read 
>>>>>> translations and dabble in Greek words).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd always assumed that what standardly gets translated as "measure" was 
>>>>>> related to the Latin "ratio," and that old saw about how "reason" and 
>>>>>> mathematical "measuring" are ancient relations. etc.  Well, the Latin 
>>>>>> "ratio" is the translation of "logos," which all us amateurs recognize 
>>>>>> as one of the more famous Greek words: reason, thought, account, 
>>>>>> measure, word, etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The Greek word translated as "measure" in Protagoras' aphorism is _not_ 
>>>>>> Logos, but
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Metron
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Metro" in modern Greek is still "measure."  However, what I ran across 
>>>>>> which made much of what the actual Greek word is was an alternative 
>>>>>> translation by Mario Untersteiner (often considered a renegade scholar 
>>>>>> by respected Anglophones I've run across), who wrote a book on the 
>>>>>> Sophists that is almost impossible to find in English for under $50 
>>>>>> (been out of print for half a century):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Man is the master of all experiences..."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have no bead on what Greek word (or phrase) "things" or "experiences" 
>>>>>> translates.  All I can identify is "metron" and "anthropos" (the 
>>>>>> gender-neutral "man").  But I imagine "experiences" sounds even better 
>>>>>> to Pirsigians, whatever one might think of "measure vs. master."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>>> 
>>>>   
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>   
>>>> Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...    
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>> 
>>>   
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>   
>>> Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...    
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> 
>>   
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>   
>> Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...    
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
>   
> _______________________________________________________________________
>   
> Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

  
_______________________________________________________________________
   
Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...     
 






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to