On 2 Feb 2010 at 10:11, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:27 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > On 2 Feb 2010 at 3:26, MarshaV wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> Greetings
> >> 
> >> I have stated clearly that I know nothing of the Absolute, and I state 
> >> nothing
> >> that is absolute.  I stated that static (conventional) truth is relative, 
> >> relative 
> >> to individual history and context.
> >> 
> >>      "The reason there is a difference between individual evaluations of 
> >> quality
> >>      is that although Dynamic Quality is a constant, these static patterns 
> >> are
> >>      different for everyone because each person has a different static 
> >> pattern of
> >>      life history. Both the Dynamic Quality and the static patterns 
> >> influence his
> >>      final judgment. That is why there is some uniformity among individual 
> >> value
> >>      judgments but not complete uniformity."   
> >>     (RMP, SODV)
> >> 
> >> This statement also seems to indicate that static patterns of value (static
> >> truth, conventional truth) are not equal, but different. and explains why.
> >> I do not understand relative truth to be 'extreme'.  
> > 
> > Hi Marsha,
> > 
> > When you state "nothing is absolute" you state an absolute ("nothing is . 
> > . . ) which contradicts your statement. Pirsig also states an absolute 
> > when he says, "these static patterns are different for everyone."
> > 
> > Any statement that demands to be taken as valid such as "nothing is 
> > absolute" or "static patterns are different for everyone" acknowledges 
> > the existence of an absolute truth from the start. Once that exception is 
> > granted the whole illusory universe of relativism is overthrown.
> > 
> 
> Platt,
> 
> I stated "I know nothing about the Absolute", and "I state nothing that is
> absolute", not 'nothing IS absolute.'  I stated that static (conventional) 
> truth is
> relative, relative to individual history and context.  
> 
> 
>      "The reason there is a difference between individual evaluations of 
> quality
>      is that although Dynamic Quality is a constant, these static patterns are
>      different for everyone because each person has a different static 
> pattern of
>      life history. Both the Dynamic Quality and the static patterns influence 
> his
>      final judgment. That is why there is some uniformity among individual 
> value
>      judgments but not complete uniformity."   
>        (RMP, SODV)
> 
> This statement also seems to indicate that static patterns of value (static
> truth, conventional truth) are not equal, but different. and explains why.
> I do not understand relative truth to be 'extreme'.  
> 
> Marsha

Marsha,

What is the difference between "I state nothing that is absolute" and 
"Nothing is absolute?" Are you saying some statements are absolute but 
you never make such statements? If so, what about your statement, "I 
state that nothing . . ." Is that not a statement that is absolute? Sounds 
to me like you are absolutely certain that "I state nothing that is 
absolute." Once you acknowledge the certain truth of that statement, the 
universe of relativism is overthrown. 

What's "extreme" is the absolutist assertion that truth is relative, a 
statement that self-contradictory and thus nonsensical.

Also, you seem to make a distinction between plain truth and static, 
conventional truth as if there was another kind of truth that supersedes 
that which is static/conventional. What might be the nature of such a 
"different" truth?

Finally, where we find common ground is when we leave the 
intellectually focused SOM truth-world behind and step into the world of 
art and beauty. Whether a Rachmaniov concerto is true or not is 
irrelevant to its meaning  Maybe Pirsig is trying to nudge intellect into 
that aesthetic realm by his gallery method of determining truth. If so, 
arguments about whether truth is absolute, relative or "sensible" become 
pointless. We then judge truth by its splendor. 

Platt





Platt

.    .    
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to