Dear Marsha
I am answering, therefore I am. I am for real.
I am free to use my free will and choose something *between* adding,
deformulating or revaluating the message. Real Dynamic Quality work
which makes it either better or worse, half depending on the quality of
the reader. It is a process, an event. You're part of the event while
reading this. You're as important as I am in this. I just can't do it
without your assistance.
Metaphysics is mirroring the event to understand HOW the event is
working and to be able to do a better job.
This forums intention is to discuss and understand MOQ in that perspective.
Horse is doing the practical mirroring of the MOQ. Dmb is very clear and
concise too.
I dont think there is much need for another mirroring activity or the
"Metaphysics of the Metaphysics" here but as I can see that many of your
submissions is often about "mirroring the mirror/questioning the
question" I thought you might be interested in reading the works of
Boris Vian. He's quite fun sometimes.
Wish I was the best..
Jan-Anders
[email protected] skrev 2011-04-12 09.52:
Jan,
Words on a page, or spoken may be very important and wise, but more so
if accompanied by insight. - But you haven't said anything and left the entire
suggestion for interpretation and projection.
Marsha
On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:
> Hi Marsha
>
> Upon your last statement below.
>
> J-A
>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:57:37 -0400
>> From: MarshaV<[email protected]>
>> To:[email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>
>> Hi Jan-Anders,
>>
>> On what basis do you ask the question?
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Jan-Anders wrote:
>>
>>> > Hi Marsha
>>> > > Have you ever considered studying Boris Vian? He founded
something he called Pataphysics which is related to Metaphysics as Metaphysics is related to
Physics.
>>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Vian
>>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Pataphysics
>>> > > Best
>>> > > Jan-Anders
>>> > > [email protected] skrev 2011-04-11 19.16:
>>>> >> Message: 2
>>>> >> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:32:16 -0400
>>>> >> From: MarshaV<[email protected]>
>>>> >> To:[email protected]
>>>> >> Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>>>> >> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>> >> >> >> On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>> > [Marsha]
>>>>>> >>> > Me, you and Pirsig are a fiction.
>>>>>> >>> > > [Arlo]
>>>>>> >>> > Okay. Is The MOQ a fiction as well? Should we take something more seriously if
"The MOQ" says it, than if "Pirsig" says it?
>>>> >> Marsha:
>>>> >> The MoQ is an intellectual static pattern of value. A very good
one, a keeper. The inherently existing self does collapse on examination. While a collection of
static patterns of value from all four levels, Mr. Pirsig is a very good collection, also a
keeper. Personally I'm a negative empiricist and a radical skeptic, I'd always have to
investigate for myself no matter what's been said by whom, whether God, President, Mr. Pirsig or
the Beatles. So far, it has all ultimately come down to not this, not that.
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
