Jan-Anders,

Have you ever considered studying the works of D. T. Suzuki?  He has something 
good to say about Zen Buddhism.  It helps overcome the need for conciseness.   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.T._Suzuki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen


Best,

Marsha




On Apr 12, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:

> Dear Marsha
> 
> I am answering, therefore I am. I am for real.
> 
> I am free to use my free will and choose something *between* adding, 
> deformulating or revaluating the message. Real Dynamic Quality work which 
> makes it either better or worse, half depending on the quality of the reader. 
> It is a process, an event. You're part of the event while reading this. 
> You're as important as I am in this. I just can't do it without your 
> assistance.
> 
> Metaphysics is mirroring the event to understand HOW the event is working and 
> to be able to do a better job.
> 
> This forums intention is to discuss and understand MOQ in that perspective.
> 
> Horse is doing the practical mirroring of the MOQ. Dmb is very clear and 
> concise too.
> 
> I dont think there is much need for another mirroring activity or the 
> "Metaphysics of the Metaphysics" here but as I can see that many of your 
> submissions is often about "mirroring the mirror/questioning the question" I 
> thought you might be interested in reading the works of Boris Vian. He's 
> quite fun sometimes.
> 
> Wish I was the best..
> 
> Jan-Anders
> 
> [email protected] skrev 2011-04-12 09.52:
>> Jan,
>> 
>> Words on a page, or spoken may be very important and wise, but more so
>> if accompanied by insight.  -  But you haven't said anything and left the 
>> entire
>> suggestion for interpretation and projection.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:
>> 
>>> >  Hi Marsha
>>> >  >  Upon your last statement below.
>>> >  >  J-A
>>> >  
>>>> >>  Message: 2
>>>> >>  Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:57:37 -0400
>>>> >>  From: MarshaV<[email protected]>
>>>> >>  To:[email protected]
>>>> >>  Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>>>> >>  Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>>> >>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>> >>  >>  >>  Hi Jan-Anders,
>>>> >>  >>  On what basis do you ask the question?
>>>> >>  >>  >>  Marsha
>>>> >>  >>  >>  >>  On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Jan-Anders wrote:
>>>> >>  
>>>>>> >>>  >    Hi Marsha
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   Have you ever considered studying Boris Vian? He founded 
>>>>>> >>> something he called Pataphysics which is related to Metaphysics as 
>>>>>> >>> Metaphysics is related to Physics.
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Vian
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Pataphysics
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   Best
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   Jan-Anders
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   [email protected]   skrev 2011-04-11 
>>>>>> >>> 19.16:
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Message: 2
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:32:16 -0400
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    From: MarshaV<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    To:[email protected]
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Message-ID:<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    >>   >>   On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Arlo Bensinger 
>>>>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>  
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>  >>>    >     [Marsha]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>  >>>    >     Me, you and Pirsig are a fiction.
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>  >>>    >     >    [Arlo]
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>  >>>    >     Okay. Is The MOQ a fiction as well? Should we 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> take something more seriously if "The MOQ" says it, than if 
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> "Pirsig" says it?
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    Marsha:
>>>>>>>> >>>>  >>    The MoQ is an intellectual static pattern of value.  A 
>>>>>>>> >>>> very good one, a keeper.  The inherently existing self does 
>>>>>>>> >>>> collapse on examination.  While a collection of static patterns 
>>>>>>>> >>>> of value from all four levels, Mr. Pirsig is a very good 
>>>>>>>> >>>> collection, also a keeper.   Personally I'm a negative empiricist 
>>>>>>>> >>>> and a radical skeptic, I'd always have to investigate for myself 
>>>>>>>> >>>> no matter what's been said by whom, whether God, President, Mr. 
>>>>>>>> >>>> Pirsig or the Beatles.    So far, it has all ultimately come down 
>>>>>>>> >>>> to not this, not that.
>>> >  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to