Jan-Anders, Thanks for the suggestion.
Marsha On Apr 12, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Jan-Anders wrote: > Dear Marsha > > I am answering, therefore I am. I am for real. > > I am free to use my free will and choose something *between* adding, > deformulating or revaluating the message. Real Dynamic Quality work which > makes it either better or worse, half depending on the quality of the reader. > It is a process, an event. You're part of the event while reading this. > You're as important as I am in this. I just can't do it without your > assistance. > > Metaphysics is mirroring the event to understand HOW the event is working and > to be able to do a better job. > > This forums intention is to discuss and understand MOQ in that perspective. > > Horse is doing the practical mirroring of the MOQ. Dmb is very clear and > concise too. > > I dont think there is much need for another mirroring activity or the > "Metaphysics of the Metaphysics" here but as I can see that many of your > submissions is often about "mirroring the mirror/questioning the question" I > thought you might be interested in reading the works of Boris Vian. He's > quite fun sometimes. > > Wish I was the best.. > > Jan-Anders > > [email protected] skrev 2011-04-12 09.52: >> Jan, >> >> Words on a page, or spoken may be very important and wise, but more so >> if accompanied by insight. - But you haven't said anything and left the >> entire >> suggestion for interpretation and projection. >> >> >> Marsha >> ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
