Hi Andre and all, Hi Andre and all,
I have trouble with the third level of Pirsig's model for evolution, the "Social level". The politics in an anthill does not equate to voting for a leader, nor does selecting a leader by genetics violate voting for a leader. I do not have trouble viewing DQ as emotions and intellect as DQ/SQ. When I ponder emotions I cannot define a feeling of Joy. More importantly when I ponder electing a president, politics assures me that my vote is secret not indefinable. Undefined/defined. DQ comes before SQ. Politicians know that emotions vote a lot, and loveable adds are necessary. In a DQ/SQ metaphysics How can DQ be described? There is something very individual in a choice before the full definition of a thought. SQ defined is mechanical, DQ undefined is emotional, metaphysics. I equate emotions with DQ in that they are indefinable and prior to SQ intellect. The necessity for an awareness in DQ is the perception of reality and evolution. There has to be sentient understanding, emotion, before political speaking, intellect. This applies to science as well. Science is immoral without it, the holocaust. On 4/16/11 9:39 AM, "Andre Broersen" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > So therefore I ask: 1) do you see emotions as a separate level (within the > MOQ)? 2) how do you argue that emotions are indefinable? and 3) how can you > equate emotions with DQ?. <snip> Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
