Hi, The purpose of MoQ (imo) is to provide awareness of the traps presented. If the cage is seen as such, one can move beyond it. Reification, as you use it, is a tool. We could consider the computer to be a cage, but many do not. The separation you mention can be destroyed through MoQ. Mark
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:46 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > And in this reification process, it is that cage wall that creates separation > between the phenomenon/concept and the self when an image, construct or > definition is erected and assigned. imho > > >> >> >> To me this quote represents reification, where the cage of a definition >> excludes context, intuition and heart. >> >> >> >>> >>> RMP: >>> >>> "... The definition is a cage... You set limits on what a word is. You >>> set limits on what your experience is. And those limits, which you set in >>> order that you can manipulate these words, are also a cage for that word. >>> It can't go beyond it one way or another." >>> >>> ('The MOQ at Oxford', Part 4: The Church of Reason) >>> >>> >> >> > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
