Horse, I have only a static 'understanding' of the MoQ. I am not trying, one way or another, to make anybody else accept it. I am still exploring different aspects. Patterns happens to be one area that I found interesting right from the beginning. My mention of Arlo was just kidding. I meant no harm. I think Arlo's project is great.
Marsha On Jun 12, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Horse wrote: > Marsha > > While I'm sure Arlo will be flattered, the reason that Dave spends so much > time on what you say is because, over the years, you have managed, > consistently, to misunderstand Pirsigs MoQ. > You seem to have a very good grasp of Bo's MoQ, Marsha's MoQ, etc., etc. > However neither of the aforementioned (or the etc.'s) appear to have much in > common with the MoQ as described by Robert M. Pirsig and this, I believe, is > the point that DMB is trying to convey. > He (and others) also needs to spend that amount of time because (as with Bo > previously) you are spending more than a reasonable amount of time promoting > a misinterpretation of Pirsigs MoQ on a forum that is here to discuss > Pirsig's MoQ. > > Still, as Dave says in another post, it has given him (and a few others) the > chance to defend the MoQ against the sort of misinterpretations that could > (and does in at least on case) cause confusion. > > Horse > > On 11/06/2011 20:51, MarshaV wrote: >> dmb, >> >> I'm so flattered that you need so much of my attention. Nine out of ten of >> your posts are directed towards what I have said. While I think you are >> cute, I still cannot vote for you to become prom queen. I am going to vote >> for Arlo. >> >> >> Marsha > > -- ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
