Marsha defended the charge of being logically inconsistent by saying:
Within MoQ self as a a collection of ever-changing, interrelated, impermanent,
static patterns of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in a
field of Dynamic Quality, there is NO locus of control and NO permanence.
dmb says:
A collection of ever-changing static patterns?
Will somebody please explain to Marsha why this statement is logically
incoherent?
Will somebody please explain that "static" is the opposite of "ever-changing"?
Will somebody please explain that there is better word for ever-changing, one
that is opposed to "static" within the MOQ and that this word is "dynamic".
Will somebody please explain exactly how and why her claim is nonsense?
She won't hear it from me but she really, really, really needs to hear from
somebody.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
