Marsha (repeatedly) asked dmb four questions and in reply to the answers said 
only:

It seems to you, dmb, quite meaningless to neither accept nor reject both 
sides. 


dmb says:
So, it would probably be safe to assume that getting answers was not really the 
purpose of your questions. That's classic Marsha behavior, isn't it? That's how 
you got to be called Lucy and that was you pulling away the football once 
again. This is what you do. Ask and ask and ask and when the answer comes, you 
find some silly way to dump on it or dismiss it. Here, for example, all you did 
was repeat one of my assertions. Why bother to respond at all? What's the point 
in posting such a little nothing? 

Yes, Marsha, as I said, your equivocal position seems quite meaningless, nor do 
I see how you could come to that conclusion. See, at this point a person would 
normally counter that assertion by trying to explain how they came to the 
conclusion and in what sense such a position could have any meaning. That is 
widely known as a "conversation" or "dialogue". Apparently, you've never heard 
of such a thing.


Which raises the question; what are you doing here anyway? You're obviously not 
interested in having any real discussion and you're always playing some other 
game. Get a hobby or something, will you? Go away and get happy somewhere else. 





                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to