Hi Mark, The question of logic comes to the fore. DQ/SQ is a metaphysical description for reality. Why? I do not know if you are using "prove" in the sense of a dialectic. Is logic defined in emotion? It has something to do with communication. If words are a symbol that stand for something, how do millions of individuals use the "stand for something" with the same metaphysical meaning of the word? Trust!
Metaphysics answers questions well or poorly. What is the determining criteria? Dialogue! What is logical discourse in a discussion of a new metaphysics? I say so! I may be wrong! I may be illogical. I guess logic is appealing to a critique in my trustworthiness in the past. Evolution and the use of words have a logical connection. Or is logic: I am so smart and I say so because I feel it even if I have no words for my feelings. All words carry baggage like faith! Even logic! Don't sweat the small stuff! Joe On 11/6/11 7:48 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Forget I said faith since that word carries all sorts of baggage. Instead I > will say that logic is based on assumptions that we cannot prove. Yes, > assumptions not faith. Many assumptions we never question, I don't know why. > I guess they just seem right and so we create logic and intellect based on > that emotion. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
