Hi Mark, I accept the discipline of metaphysics cannot be understood in the language of physics mathematics. I see the color purple and it is different from the color blue. Vibrations matter to perception. Vibrations in what?
Light has a spectrum. Sound has an octave. Touch distinguishes soft and hard, hot and cold without the input of education. The assumption of words, not words for communication would leave a baby helpless in communication. That is not my experience in comforting a baby. Experience is prior to words. Memory is prior to words. Emotions are prior to words. I do not know how sounds, sights, sensations can distinguish without definition, but my experience acknowledges I distinguish colors, sounds, sensations without definition. The metaphysics DQ/SQ. Joe On 11/12/11 7:39 AM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > When you state undefinable/definable I assume you mean "that which can not be > exchanged through words/that which can". We each have our own limits to what > we can convey in words, and such conveyance requires a willing listener. The > way I see it, the undefinable is temporarily defined as best one can, and then > returns to the undefinable. One should not hold on to the definition except > as an analogy for it is not the real thing, but an abstraction used for > communication. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
