Mark, And, for example, your comment concerning "deaf ears" was not one of pretentious, disarming, condescension. :-)
Marsha On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:15 AM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marsha, > I do not disagree with you, I just have a different approach. I have no > problem with your approach. We just have a different sense of Quality. > > Carry on, > Mark > > Sent laboriously from an iPhone, > Mark > > On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Mark, >> >> This post seems like philosophical/psychological chum thrown overboard to >> see what it will attract. I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, >> but often I cannot find a precise point of disagreement. Is there a >> specific point you'd like to discuss? >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:55 AM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Marsha, >>> I appreciate the labels that you are giving to DQ. I think I understand >>> where you are coming from. You present a kind of metaphysical theology. >>> There is also another kind of metaphysics, that is one which traces back >>> to ultimate principles. I am' dealing with the latter approach. It is >>> simply two different approaches. I am sure that your approach brings you >>> much fulfillment. >>> >>> This forum is about the metaphysics of Quality. That is, it is meant to >>> provide a description of Quality in metaphysical terms. Certainly >>> unknowable can be one such description, but I am curious where you take it >>> from there. Is the first principle that it cannot be described? If so, we >>> are speaking of a metaphysics of the indescribable, which is more of a >>> Christian approach to reality. I have no problem with this. >>> >>> Any metaphysics of Quality comes from one's personal relationship, through >>> Quality, with existence. I fully appreciate that your relationship with >>> existence is one of unknowability. This indeed can be one of wonder, and >>> be very fulfilling, and I appreciate you candor in providing this to me. >>> That IT is there but that we will never know it. Thanks for that. I have >>> some more thoughts concerning my approach, which may fall on deaf ears. >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: snip... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
