Hi Dan
Interesting. So for you memories are not a form of experience?
Is experience only something that you can have about what is
present in the now? This looks like a version of presentism and various
philosophers have seen this as part of standard empiricism and
I am surprised to find that you think it is part of the MOQ
but is that your position? I can see that it is possible to cut the
MOQ this way, so for you SQ is only something that can be established
in thinking after the event of dynamic experience, all experience
is dynamic for you, only in thinking and memory is SQ able to
become something we are aware of for you? But then what
is this thinking and memory, this sounds like a dualism between
experience and thinking/memory a sort of phenomenon versus
thinking/memory (subjectivity) dualism? Seems problematic
to me? How would you describe your position?
regards
David M
So we experience SQ and DQ.
Dan:
No we do not, not in the MOQ. I've been over this a thousand times
with David Harding and have no desire to continue here.
Dan:
I think you are using the term 'experience' in a number of ways that
do not do justice to the MOQ. If we remember that experience and
Dynamic Quality become synonymous within the MOQ, then it is easy to
see we do not experience static qualtiy. Static quality is a memory of
experience. Static quality emerges from experience. We do not
experience static quality, however. That only leads to giganitic
misunderstandings which many contrtibutors here are currently
suffering from.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
