Hello everyone On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:50 AM, David Morey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan > > Interesting. So for you memories are not a form of experience?
Dan: Well, I thought we were discussing the MOQ, here. Right? > Is experience only something that you can have about what is > present in the now? This looks like a version of presentism and various > philosophers have seen this as part of standard empiricism and > I am surprised to find that you think it is part of the MOQ > but is that your position? Dan: I have no idea what you are talking about. The MOQ subscribes to pure empiricism. > I can see that it is possible to cut the MOQ this > way, so for you SQ is only something that can be established > in thinking after the event of dynamic experience, all experience > is dynamic for you, only in thinking and memory is SQ able to become > something we are aware of for you? Dan: You seem to be under the (mistaken) impression that I am making this up. I am not. A little reading will verify what I say. Rather than asking a lot of questions that don't much make sense, perhaps you might avail yourself to some of Robert Pirsig's writings, both his books as well as his subsequent work with Anthony McWatt and me. Until you catch up, I see little hope of continuing this discussion. > But then what > is this thinking and memory, this sounds like a dualism between > experience and thinking/memory a sort of phenomenon versus > thinking/memory (subjectivity) dualism? Seems problematic > to me? How would you describe your position? Dan: My position? I feel I have as good a grasp upon the MOQ as anyone. Would that be considered my position? Thank you, Dan http://www.danglover.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
