Dan G said to Ron, Arlo, DMB et al, May 4th 2013: > Experience is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between > experience and recognition. Dr. Gurr seems to go into this a bit in the > paper that Ant shared. William James also goes into this, which RMP quotes > in Lila. Experience and our conception of experience are never identical. > Once we have pigeon-holed experience into categories it is no longer > experience. It becomes a memory of experience, or in the MOQ, static > quality.
Ant McWatt comments: Dan, Just a small refinement but I think it would be clearer if you added the prefix "pure" to the word experience in the above paragraph as static quality patterns are a form of experience too (though a type of conceptualised/patterned experience)! e.g "Pure experience (i.e. unpatterned Quality/Dynamic Quality) is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between pure experience and recognition...." Best wishes, Ant . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
