Good luck Ant, If you'll look at the thread in the archives - 'Is experience just DQ?' - I've tried to show Dan time and time again that rather than just see that there is 'experience' he recognise that there is a difference between 'pure' experience and the experience of static quality. So far to no avail. But then I think what is shaping his staunch view on this is what he values. Maybe he'll value your opinion enough here to take a second look? Dan?
djh On 05/05/2013, at 1:18 PM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > Dan G said to Ron, Arlo, DMB et al, May 4th 2013: > >> Experience is pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between >> experience and recognition. Dr. Gurr seems to go into this a bit in the >> paper that Ant shared. William James also goes into this, which RMP quotes >> in Lila. Experience and our conception of experience are never identical. >> Once we have pigeon-holed experience into categories it is no longer >> experience. It becomes a memory of experience, or in the MOQ, static >> quality. > > > Ant McWatt comments: > > Dan, > > Just a small refinement but I think it would be clearer if you added the > prefix "pure" to the word experience in the above paragraph as static quality > patterns are a form of experience too (though a type of > conceptualised/patterned experience)! > > e.g > > "Pure experience (i.e. unpatterned Quality/Dynamic Quality) is > pre-conceptual. That is why there is always a lag between pure experience > and recognition...." > > Best wishes, > > Ant > > > > . > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
